9

Colleen Lynn now blaming Pit Bulls for interstate crashes

Posted June 11th, 2013 in Discrimination, Prejudice and tagged , , , by Josh

Does this creature from DogsBite.org ever not opt to stoop lower and lower?

hatemongers3

Yes ladies and gentlemen… Dogs from Boston apparently drive cars now. Lynn wants people to know: Pit Bulls are terrible drivers, yet still legal, so still able to drive these giant moving vehicles and put all of our lives at risk. We must put a stop to this practice immediately!

I mean, in all seriousness… This disingenuous propagandist is one of America’s “sources” on dog bites. LMAO. She has the world’s biggest vendetta against millions of dogs, dogs that she’d love to have sole discretion over determining their fate and then disappearing them from the planet. The tyrant who’d love to be known as queen-bee-visual-ID, memory-holing Pit Bulls since the day that society rolled over and gave into mindlessness. That’s her utopia. Keep dreaming.

Had the driver of the automobile been killed Lynn and her website would have chalked it up to being “mauled by a Pit Bull.” You think that’s a joke. It’s not.

There’s literally NOTHING in this story about the dog attacking anyone. The dog’s crime? Jumping on the driver’s lap. Why? Because the driver had it unrestrained. After the crash? It was understandably terrified and ran away. Yet Colleen Lynn feels it necessary to headline-lead with “Pit Bull causes fiery highway crash.” AND THIS IS WHO YOU GO TO FOR “UNBIAS” DOG BITE INFORMATION!? Jesus Christ. No mention of the dog being unrestrained, thus allowing it to climb into the driver’s lap, and thus hinting at individual irresponsibility. And when people come along that do want to mention this (like Debbie Bell below) they then spin it to make it seem like all Pit Bull owners purposely want to drive recklessly in an effort to kill people. There’s that all-encompassing characteristic that’s meant to demonize everyone broadly. It’s always there to make its presence felt.

The most popular comment on the thread is one that calls all Pit Bull owners “irresponsible” and “antisocial,” then goes further to say that the act of owning a Pit Bull is “confrontational” and “offensive” in and of itself. Awesome. Again, way to demonize millions of dogs and potentially millions of people. But see, that’s the only consistent marking for these positions, and from the people that would hold these positions up. They demonize in the broadest and vaguest ways possible. The proof is always in the pudding.

I believe that society will always come to shun such illegitimacy of thought. That’s my 2 cents, but I’m still going to be around to point it out anyways.

But here you go… Here’s hatemonger Debbie Bell and her wonderful logic in its full glory…

hatemongers4