0

When puppies are killed the Carson shelter always cries “parvo”

Posted September 25th, 2013 in Shelters and tagged , by Josh

6puppies

The woman who took these photos updated her thread that all 6 of them were killed this morning because they had “parvo.” 3 of the 6 ID#s were A4632094, A4633095 and A4632097. She also mentioned that when she called 2 days ago she was told that they were exposed to parvo but had all tested negative. Now here they are dead, killed under the guise of having parvo.

Newsflash: The Carson shelter says that every puppy they kill has “parvo.” This is a given. It’s not even a legitimate statement, rather a dubious claim meant to justify their lazy tactics of murdering innocent puppies that they’d rather not waste any energy on networking or securing rescue for. Why would they do any of that? They think so little of rescues and the process that’s involved that they don’t even have a rescue coordinator, a position that most kill shelters have, even if just for looks. They haven’t had one for about 2 years now and the last woman to hold the position wasn’t at all qualified, shocker.

I would suggest that people do public record requests for the medical paperwork, and then publish the results that you get back. At the very least it shows that people are engaged and it tells them they are being watched. Were tests even given? Or were blocks just filled out, copied and pasted to give the appearance that tests were given and that all the puppies tested positive? There’s no way to know, and this shelter knows it. They don’t have to document in any fashion whether a test was given, or what the results were, that would then coincide with any piece of information that actually tracks back to something. They can simply fill in a box, but this is all done on the honor system. The Carson shelter has no honor.

How about some energy be put forth in trying to find out how these dogs were actually exposed to parvo in the first place? How about some energy be put forth in trying to better the sanitation realities that allow such diseases to spread, if in this case such disease even existed? Instead, this shelter basically functions under carte blanche, acting in any way that they see fit. I am the unofficial oversight. You can be the unofficial oversight. If we aren’t then they have none. Those in “official” positions could patently care less.